Ask and ye shall receive. The Slate God provides for us all.
Dawkins sounds like an interesting fellow. I like the idea that we are hairless for sexual and lice reasons. I would love to read a book of his should it fall onto my doorstep at christmas. It all sounds very reasonable and informative except the last bit:
“You’ve called religion a ‘dangerous collective delusion’ and a ‘malignant infection,’ ” I said. “Don’t you think you’re underplaying it a bit?”
Dawkins turned, smiled a small fox smile, and said, “Yes!”
Why should we repeat the mistakes of slavish devotion to Aristotelian philosophy with Darwinism?
Christianity did not begin the scourge of science. However, over the centuries, Aristotelian philosophy was so seemingly powerful and complete in its conclusions that the church adopted them as near gospel. Of course the four elements were fire, earth, air and water. And of course earth is the heaviest, which falls the fastest and thus is at the center of the universe. Only a fool would suggest something besides Earth was at the center of the universe. Just look up at all the stars and sun today: Who revolves around who?
I imagine it was ancient philosophers like Dawkins who displayed such an intolerance of others’ views (because he was so certain of his own) that instilled the same manner on the church. We always knew the Earth was a sphere (not just Columbus), and over 2,000 years ago we had Greeks proposing a Solar-centric world-view. It was rejected because of the ludicrous distances between the Earth, sun and planets it required. When it finally became apparent that the Church’s conclusions were wrong (and those ludicrous distances true), the church was unable to correct what it had so forcefully asserted.
In my mind, far better to allow religion into science, and leave all theories acceptable to religion. A smart investor diversifies his funds. I see no reason priests shouldn’t as well. Also, scientists shouldn’t be so damn insistent that God does not exist when we do not know the first thing about anything. Anything that answers more whys than it creates is an incomplete answer indeed.